The Court observed that the exhibition of a film certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (Censor Board) cannot be stopped merely due to objections raised by a small section of society.
During the hearing, the bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice J.B. Pardiwala stated that if the release of the film damages the reputation of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal case, such harm cannot be undone.
Usually, when pro-Hindu films are made, there is pressure to delete certain scenes under the pretext of “objections,” which ironically generates pre-release publicity. But this time, a different strategy was used.
In the complaint filed by Hire, it was stated that the web series Gandi Baat, Class of 2017, and Class of 2020 depict obscene images of minor girls.
Sanoj Mishra, the director of ‘The Diary of West Bengal’, said in Mumbai that we have to put in more effort into the release of the film than the amount of labour we have put into making it. We had to reshoot many scenes from the film.
The film ‘The Diary of West Bengal’ portrays the political and religious situation in Bengal.
Even 57 years after the death of Swatantryaveer Savarkar, who made incomparable sacrifices for India’s Independence, injustices against him continue.
A memorandum with these proposals has been submitted with the law ministry. Our foundation is working to create awareness about this issue at all levels.
When the film was shown to the Censor Board, it promised to certify within the stipulated time. There is no official response from Syed Rabi Hashmi regarding Dulgaj’s allegations.
The film has received a certificate from the Central Board of Film Certification. The same scenes are shown in the trailer, so how can it be denied permission ?’