Veer Savarkar’s grandson Satyaki Savarkar’s retorts in cross-examination foils Rahul Gandhi and his lawyers’ plan
Filing petitions during British rule was a regular and lawful process.
Filing petitions during British rule was a regular and lawful process.
The government should take ownership of the ‘Savarkar Sadan’ building and establish a grand museum there housing Savarkar’s manuscripts and letters.
‘Atheism is acceptable in Hindu Dharma, and Savarkar, who taught the definition of Hindutva to the Chief Minister, was also an atheist.’
In a 2013 tweet, Ayyub wrote: “Ravana did not even touch Sita, though he could have.
The defamation case against Rahul Gandhi was heard in the Pune special court. Satyaki made all these revelations while answering the questions asked by advocate Milind Pawar on behalf of Rahul Gandhi in the cross-examination.
The Court has issued notices to ‘X’ Corp, the Union Government and the Delhi Police to take joint action and asked for their responses.
The memorial has informed that men should wear full trousers or women should wear salwars so that the feet are not injured.
Whatever was necessary to safeguard the national interests would have been implemented by Savarkar through foreign policy !
‘It is not that our good days came because the BJP came to power. It is the opposite. We are powerful. People listen to us. The BJP benefits from it. Our work has increased.
The Supreme Court on 13th January dismissed a PIL seeking the removal of the oil portrait of Veer Savarkar from the Central Hall of the Parliament and other public places.