Domestically, Sindoor reflected a more self assured political posture. The operation was not accompanied by triumphalism or inflammatory rhetoric. Instead, it projected strategic patience and controlled resolve.
On one hand, Siddaramaiah expresses concern over the growing influence of alcohol, while on the other, he claims to have no objection to drinking – a clear indication of double standards.
Mentioning the debate that “Milk is supplied from villages to cities, while whisky and brandy are sent from cities to villages,”
Such ‘unilateral artificial expansion’ of territorial claims is not acceptable to India under any circumstances.
In a global consumer culture where Hindu symbols are routinely commodified on clothing, merchandise, and especially through commercialized yoga branding, do you see this as simple ignorance or as a continuation of colonial patterns of appropriation and trivialization ?
When will Hindus establish such a position that no one dares to insult their places of faith and India through any medium ?
Across these cases, a stark pattern emerges: Hindus possess presence without power, memory without enforcement and symbols without sovereignty. Hindu symbology is attacked not because it is aggressive, but because it is structurally undefended.
Justice Swaminathan had recently directed that a traditional lamp be lit at a lamp post located near a dargah at Tirupparankundram in Tamil Nadu.
The government must disclose the names of those responsible and clearly state what action will be taken against them.
Hindu organisations claim that funding from George Soros’ foundation raises questions about the credibility of the report.