Those who do not believe in Gurus are fools

Statement by Madras High Court Judge G.R. Swaminathan

Madras High Court Judge G.R. Swaminathan

Hosur (Tamil Nadu) – Some people in Tamil Nadu describe themselves as rationalists. Because we regard our Gurus as divine, such people call us rogues, fools and uncivilised. Those who make such remarks are themselves rogues, fools and uncivilised. This is not a principle of rational scrutiny but an attempt to mock those who have faith in Gurus, said Madras High Court Judge G.R. Swaminathan while addressing the ‘Guru Vandana Utsav’ here, criticising rationalists.

Explaining the philosophical basis of Guru worship, Justice Swaminathan said that although God may not be visible in a physical form, a Guru represents a living spiritual embodiment. There may be many Gurus in different mutts, but their underlying philosophical foundation remains the same. In Indian tradition, a Guru is viewed not merely as a teacher, but as a guiding force who instils knowledge, discipline and moral values.

Faith strengthened through personal experience

Referring to a personal incident, Justice Swaminathan stated that while travelling from Chandigarh to Delhi, his car broke down in dense fog and visibility was extremely poor. At that moment, he remembered his Guru and offered prayers. Fortunately, no untoward incident occurred. Faith provides mental strength during difficult times, he said.

Will continue service with the Guru’s blessings

Justice Swaminathan said that he has more than four years of service remaining. During this period, he would draw strength from his Guru to discharge his duties with courage.

Who is Justice Swaminathan ?

Justice Swaminathan had recently directed that a traditional lamp be lit at a lamp post located near a dargah at Tirupparankundram in Tamil Nadu. The State Government objected to the order, and more than 100 Members of Parliament reportedly moved an impeachment motion alleging that the order was discriminatory and contrary to secular principles. According to devout Hindus, the decision delivered by the Judge was appropriate and in keeping with tradition.