A ruling party MLA tore a copy of the Waqf Amendment Act in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly
On the other hand, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf Amendment Act in the Supreme Court.
On the other hand, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf Amendment Act in the Supreme Court.
The agitations by Muslims would be like the agitations staged by them at the time of freedom fight, threatening Qasmi.
Grabbing land belonging to other communities and registering it under Waqf Board’s name in the name of ‘Land Jihad’ is the sole-point agenda pursued by fanatic Muslims.
The Allahabad High Court had upheld the demolition, following which the petitioners challenged the decision in the Supreme Court.
This is an example of how Muslim organisation taking undue advantage of democracy, hold society to ransom for taking undue self-advantage. Such organisations must be taught a lesson by the government.
Stalin said the Union Government under the guise of promoting regional languages was trying to impose the three-language formula in the country.
“In the past 75 years, 52 languages have vanished from India, with 25 languages disappearing from the Hindi-speaking belt alone.”
The judiciary should be the protector of citizens’ rights. However, it is time to question whether it has truly fulfilled that role successfully.
Pankaj Bharatiya, the Deputy Secretary of the state branch of VHP, stated that there was no valid reason to oppose Maharana Pratap’s statue in front of the mosque.
How can hatred be created because of Maharana Pratap ? He was a nationalist and fought the Mughals. When every Indian should take inspiration from him, why do Muslims think like this ?