Calling other companies’ products ‘fake’ in advertisements is wrong !
The case was filed by Dabur India, which has accused Patanjali of defamation and unfair trade practices through its advertisement campaign.
Acharya Balkrishna of Patanjali Ayurveda ranked among the world’s top scientists !
Acharya Balkrishna’s deep expertise and visionary leadership in Ayurvedic research have resulted in over 300 papers being presented at prestigious international conferences.
We will withdraw all videos mentioning ‘Sarbat Jihad’
After this ‘Hamdard’ the company manufacturing ‘Rooh Afza’ filed a case against him in Delhi High Court.
Not Mughals, but revolutionaries were great : Yogrishi Ramdev Baba
Acharya Balkrishna, Managing Director of Patanjali Ayurveda Ltd, asserted earlier this week that this plant is Asia’s largest orange processing plant.
Public apology about the speech against the SC was published everywhere : President of IMA Dr Asokan
In the case of ‘Patanjali Ayurveda Limited’ circulating alleged misleading advertisements about its products, ‘IMA’ had filed a petition in the Supreme Court.
IMA Chief tenders unconditional apology to the Supreme Court
Taking note of the interview, the Supreme Court had stated, “We expected more sense of responsibility from you.
Baba Ramdev’s contribution to yoga and Ayurveda is good, but matter of Patanjali’s products is different : SC remarks
People have faith in Baba Ramdev. People look up to him. The only concern was that the public should be well informed.
Supreme Court to hear on remarks made by the president of IMA against the SC
No surprise if someone feels that the Supreme Court should also ask for a public apology from the IMA president as well.
Is the letter of apology printed as big as the advertisement ? : Supreme Court
About this apology, Patanjali’s advocate Mukul Rohatgi told the court that the advertisement cost Rs 10 lakh and was published in 67 newspapers.
Yogrushi Ramdev Baba will have to pay ‘Service Taxes’ for the Yoga Camps : SC
The Supreme Court refuted this petition and upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal.