Facebook has blocked various Pages of Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) and Sanatan Sanstha over the past two years. The famous (or notorious) ‘TIME’ magazine has commented on this issue in detail. It, therefore, stands exposed that ‘TIME’ is responsible for the blocking. ‘TIME’ could be responsible for the earlier blocking of Pages of Sanatan and HJS or someone with a similar outlook or communists could be behind it. Is the demand of ‘TIME’ to block Pages of patriotic and devout organisations’ websites not bullying ? Does ‘TIME’ know anything about the activities of Sanatan or HJS ? Can ‘TIME’ in any way be able to compete with organisations whose activities have been lauded by many Saints ?
Defamation of patriots
We know about the exploits of ‘TIME’. In the past, it was known for good writing. Some of their articles had depth and were quite well-written but not now. Now, the matter it prints reeks of Hindu-hatred. Mr. Narendra Modi was elected by millions of people. Before the end of Mr. Modi’s first tenure, reporter Aatish Taseer described him in a distorted manner as ‘India’s Divider in Chief’. Taseer crossed all limits with such accusations, exhibiting his hatred towards a renowned personality by giving false references and asserting his own hostile opinion.
It may be mentioned here that Taseer’s father is of Pakistani descent. ‘TIME’ published an article praising Mr. Modi after a warning of necessary action was indicated.
Support for India-hatred ?
PM Modi passed two laws in the interest of farmers in India but some people provoked the farmers, and Khalistanis entered the farmers’ agitation, leading to many abuses. The ‘Toolkit’ issue revealed that the main purpose of the agitation was to bring down the present Government and this was a conspiracy. Even then, ‘TIME’ published a photo of a woman farmer on its front cover and showed its support for such abuses. ‘TIME’ was, therefore, criticised later.
‘TIME’ is published in the USA. Their writers and reporters have no knowledge of Hindu culture and Hindu organisations. In fact, it has always been their (may be deliberate) attempt to present these in a distorted manner. ‘TIME’ is using its name to defame Hindu activists and publish false narratives.
Freedom of expression is a different matter; but what do we say when people take advantage to throttle others’ freedom of expression ? How many people are leading happy lives due to the activities of Sanatan and HJS ? How many families have shifted to the right path ? How many people have got rid of their addictions ? Does ‘TIME’ know about all this ? Therefore, such an irresponsible and pervert attempt by ‘TIME’ magazine condemnable. One may wonder if the bad time of ‘TIME’ has started now.
If ‘TIME’ continues with its attitude, it is certain that their readers will dwindle and undoubtedly, ‘TIME’ will face opposition in India.