In the future there will be no Hindu Dharma in India : Professor Divya Dwivedi

Ridiculous discovery by IIT Delhi’s Professor Divya Dwivedi

Professor Divya Dwivedi (Credits : Twitter)

New Delhi – A video on the social media showing IIT Professor Divya Dwivedi giving an interview to a French Channel during the G20 event is going viral. She stated, “There are two Indias. Past India of racialized caste order oppressing the majority population and then there is the India of the future that is an egalitarian India without caste oppression and Hinduism. That is the India which is not yet represented but is waiting, longing for the world to show its visage to the world.”

1) Divya: There is India of future i.e. egalitarian India which would be without Hinduism

Journalist: I talked to Rickshaw driver, he's using app for work & happy with India's growth

Divya: But, what about hoax in form of Hindu religion?

Divya Dwivedi is Professor at IIT Delhi pic.twitter.com/UzhuyF3DlS

— Anshul Saxena (@AskAnshul) September 9, 2023

Earlier she had made statements like, ‘Hindu Dharma is a false religion which was founded in the beginning of the 20th Century.’ (From this statement we can realise who is the one who is lying – Editor) In the video Divya adds, “at present the world is shown the India having the ‘Aryan Mentality’. That is why emphasis is being given to the name ‘Bharat’ instead of ‘India’. Presently the world cannot see ‘the India without Hinduism’. ‘India has been shaped over 300 years by the racialised order of caste where 10% of the upper caste minority occupy 90% of powerful positions. That continues even today”.

Editorial Viewpoints

Hindu Dharma is Sanatan Dharma. There were numerous attacks on it, the past thousands of years; many tried to destroy it, but they were destroyed and Sanatan Dharma is present in all its glory just as it always was ! This shows the extent of their intellect and learning !
What must this biased professor be teaching her students ? The Government need not be told that action should be taken against such person ?