Supreme Court rejects bail plea of accused in 2020 Bengaluru riots case
“We can’t have a society like this. This is apart from all other … there is the UAPA, and damages to public properties”, the Bench said.
“We can’t have a society like this. This is apart from all other … there is the UAPA, and damages to public properties”, the Bench said.
As per the status report filed, Saifi, a close associate of Islamists such as Tahir Hussain and Umar Khalid, had met Naik in Malaysia to raise funds for the Delhi anti-Hindu riots.
Hindus do not expect a BJP-ruled State to defame the statue of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. The Government should be have a heavy-handed approach towards anti-social elements and religious fanatics.
Religious fanatics always carry out riots with the same motive. Police are expected to suppress such riots permanently; however, the Police blame Hindus every time.
The adverse times that Sanatan has been warning about are at our doorstep ! Their impact is going to be more horrific !
It is shameful for the Police that they couldn’t stop the religious fanatics who were openly involved in the violence !
Many cities saw violence as a rampaging crowd of religious fanatics flocked to the streets in opposition to vandalization that never happened…
The violence during these protests compelled the Police to open fire at the protesters.
Hindus feel that the Court should not just stop after reprimanding, but it should severely fine the Government.
Why is bail even considered for someone serving life imprisonment ?