Litigant throws documents before Supreme Court Bench !
The petitioner, identified as Prabal Pratap, allegedly used objectionable language against the CJI and threw papers in front of the Supreme Court bench.
The petitioner, identified as Prabal Pratap, allegedly used objectionable language against the CJI and threw papers in front of the Supreme Court bench.
The Chief Justice stated that courts are often misused. People who create controversies take advantage of them.
Former Chief Justice Uday Lalit got the contact number of Mr Dhavade and assured him of getting in touch with him to obtain more details.
The bench had explicitly stated that no individual on Indian soil can be forcibly expelled or subjected to inhuman treatment.
A 2024 report from Florida International University states that India records 250–300 acid attack cases every year, but the actual number could exceed 1,000.
The advocate walked up to the judges’ dais, removed his shoe, and tried to hurl it at the Chief Justice.
Chief Justice Gavai invoked Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy, stating that any decision should consider its impact on the poorest and most marginalised individuals.
If a judge holds negative views against Hindus, he should recuse himself and transfer the matter to another bench but not pass insulting comments.
Advocate Vineet Jindal sent a letter demanding that Chief Justice Gavai withdraw his statement, stating, “This comment is against Shri Vishnu and Sanatan Dharma.”
I was always strict for one reason alone — to uphold the principles laid down by the Constitution,” said Supreme Court Justice Abhay Oka.