|
Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) – The ‘Young Thinkers Forum’ is a group of young intellectuals and thought leaders based in Madhya Pradesh that organised an event a few days back under ‘Young Thinkers Conclave’, at the auditorium of the renowned National Law Institute University after obtaining the necessary permission. The event was, however, opposed by a few communist professors and students, mainly due to the participation of Mr Neeraj Atri, a devout Hindu scholar. The organisers offered the opposing communists to present their views in the programme by holding a debate, but they did not agree. The programme was, therefore, held as per schedule without paying heed to the opposition.
Mr Neeraj Atri
The other devout Hindu activists, who attended the programme with Neeraj Atri, were Rashmi Samant, Professor Ram Sharma, journalist Swati Goyal Sharma, and other patriots. The communists from the college were making baseless allegations that all speakers spread hatred.
They objected to the list of nationalist speakers, and accused them of being involved in ‘hate mongering.’
The same coterie of leftists also opposed key sessions of the Young Thinkers’ Conclave, including ‘From Dogma to Dharma: Hindu View of Prophetic Monotheism’ and… pic.twitter.com/dypg626BXm
— OpIndia.com (@OpIndia_com) October 3, 2023
The programme was held in six sessions on two days. The two sessions that were mainly opposed were ‘From Dogma to Dharma : Hindu View of Prophetic Monotheism’ and ‘Unravelling Wokeism : Examining the DNA of Social Activism’. Wokeism is a distorted movement and the people promoting it show as if they have a thorough knowledge of the issues like social justice and political problems. These people also show that they are aware of and fight against social injustice.
One of the professors from this college tried to find a solution by offering to organise a debate for communists to present their objections, but the people opposing were firm on their demand of not allowing Atri to speak in the programme. The programme was, nonetheless, held despite the opposition.
Rashmi Samant said through ‘X’ that a small group of extremists was tearing off the posters and boards on which the names of the people, who were to address the programme, were written. The group was only interested in hooliganism, violence, and vandalism rather than taking part in discussion and debate. (Communists are always falsely accusing Hindus of throttling their voice in democracy, when many times they themselves are opposing the path of democracy. It is now time to tell the world the way communists are killing democracy. – Editor)
The communists also opposed the sale of books like ‘Jesus Christ : An Artifice for Aggression’; ‘Tipu Sultan : Villian or Hero’, ‘Hindu Rashtra and Jihad’, etc.
Communist groups opposed the programme even on ‘X’. Spiteful articles were published by the anti-Hindu news websites, viz. ‘The Wire’ and ‘The Quint’. (It shows the way of working of the network of communists. – Editor)
Hindus should present their views with total faith irrespective of ‘Cancel Culture’ ! – Neeraj AtriThe anti-social movements opposing the programmes, through various mediums and trying to cancel such programmes organised by devout Hindu activists and patriots, is called ‘Cancel Culture’ A representative of ‘Sanatan Prabhat’ contacted Mr Neeraj Atri in connection with this programme, who was the judge of this programme. He spoke about Hindu views on Christianity and Islamic religions. While talking to the ‘Sanatan Prabhat’s representative, Mr Atri said, “The communists were opposing him by accusing him as an Islam-hater. Hindus should keep presenting their views with full faith, irrespective of the ‘Cancel Culture’ of communists and anti-Hindus. Holding discussions and debates is our tradition. We should be active through communications and strongly present our views.” |
Editorial Perspective
Anti-Hindus are getting exposed since the views of devout Hindu thinkers are made viral on social media. It is bringing a change in favour of Hindus, which is not liked by communists. This opposition is a part of such hatred. |