Why Annamalai Infuriates the DMK ?

Mr Sandeep Balakrishna is a writer of Indian history, Hindu civilisation and culture for about two decades. He is a former Information Technology profess-ional with a successful career at major multinational corporations. He is the Founder and Editor of ‘The Dharma Dispatch’, an Online journal dedicated to Indian civilisation and culture.

By calling for the removal of E.V. Ramaswamy Naicker’s statues, BJP Tamil Nadu President K. Annamalai has once again hit the DMK where it hurts them the most : The ugly legacy of Periyar.

It is rather befitting that Tamil Nadu BJP President Annamalai chose Srirangam to launch his latest salvo against the ruling DMK.

Srirangam, the ancient, hoary Vishnu-Kshetra, holds a special spiritual and civilisational significance. It is one of the prime sites of the stellar Hindu fightback and resurgence that fearless pioneers of the Vijaya-nagara Empire ushered in six hundred years ago.

Srirangam is also an emotional and eternal monument to the memory of Vellayi, a Devadasi who enticed a Turushka iconoclast and jumped to her death so that the Deity of Sri Ranganatha Swamy could be saved. If we go by the alleged rationalism spewed by the spurious Dravidian discourse, Vellayi’s heroism too, would be bracketed as a Brahminical conspiracy.

Thus, among other things, the presence of E.V. Ramaswamy Naicker’s statue in front of the Ranganatha Swamy Temple is an affront to the sacred memory of countless such Vellayis who sought no glory for themselves but gladly died so that Dharma could remain undefiled.

Srirangam is not an isolated case.

E.V. Ramaswamy Naicker’s statue has a ubiquitous presence throughout Tamil Nadu, and a majority of them were deliberately erected in the close vicinity of the most sacred temples with the explicit purpose of offending Hindus : What Hindus regard as sacred is fit for annihilation. This is also the one-line summary of the alleged Periyarist – Dravidian ideology.

The irony fools none : Ramaswamy Naicker, the Dravidian version of epic Murti-Bhanjakas like Mahmud Ghazni and Aurangzeb had statues built for him in his own lifetime.

Given this historical backdrop, Annamalai’s promise to remove E.V. Ramaswamy Naicker’s statues if the BJP comes to power, is a baby step towards civilisational rectification. It mustn’t be viewed as an ideological statement but as a socio-cultural imperative that must be accomplished to preserve whatever is left of the innate Hindu character of Tamil culture and society.

The text invariably accompanying E.V. Ramaswamy Naicker’s statues reads as follows : “There is no God, there is no God, there is no God at all. He who invented God is a fool. He who propagates God is a scoundrel. He who worships God is a barbarian”.

This clearly sounds like a rabid atheist’s wet dream. Except that E.V. Ramaswamy Naicker defines ‘God’ as the Deities belonging exclusively to the vast Hindu pantheon of Devatas. The word Deva or Devata is derived from the root ‘Div’, which means ‘light’. Where light signifies spiritual wisdom, insight and self-realisation.

This selective ‘Periyarist’ definition of God is the reason we don’t see his busts and their attendant inscription outside mosques and churches in Tamil Nadu. It follows a familiar pattern. The unambiguous verdict of the history of Indian public discourse over the last eighty years is this : The atheism and rationalism of Indian intellectuals with Hindu names comes to a screeching halt on the marbled steps of a mosque and bows at the pew of a church.

Since his debut on the political scene, Annamalai has displayed this civilisational and historical underst-anding of Dravidianism as the greatest threat to Tamil culture and society. In countless rallies and speeches after speeches, he has unwaveringly called out the DMK as an ‘evil force’. Let’s not forget the manner in which the Dravidian parties captured power initially.

It was not through appeals to the finer sensibilities of the Tamil people. It was not through reasoned debates with their opponents. It was not through solemn promises for the betterment of the Tamil people.

It was through organised and targeted street violence aimed at uprooting the existing social order and harmony, and the perverse allure of a separate Tamil Nation. That they succeeded in this destructive project beyond their wildest dreams is Tamil Nadu’s eternal misfortune.

From this perspective, Annamalai’s uncompromising discourse emphasising the intrinsic Sanatana character of the Tamil culture is part of repairing the Dravidian damage. A notable instance of this conviction is when he compared the plight of Brahmins in Tamil Nadu to that of the Jews who were persecuted throughout the globe for two millennia … just for their crime of being born as Jews.

Viewing this complex and historical phenomenon exclusively through political and ideological prisms is ill-informed, misleading and fatal. A fundamental tenet of Sanatana statecraft is that political power is a means to attain a higher end.

In the inimitable words of DVG :

What is the character and nature of the people of India ? What are their life-ideals ? These are the primary and basic questions that need to be asked in our politics … [in the ideals of our people], the world is just an instrument; the other world is a possibility – it’s something that needs to be attained.

A thirsty man needs water. What is required for water is a utensil. Thus, the utensil acquires a value because of water. Likewise, worldly life acquires a value because it enables the attainment of the goal of reaching a higher world. And politics acquires a value because of worldly life. This is the chief principle.

Thus, the dominant narrative in our public discourse which portrays Annamalai’s emphasis on the reclamation of Hindu Dharma in Tamil Nadu in political terms, is a deliberate misdirection.

By miscasting his speeches and rallies solely as a bid for political power, this narrative obfuscates the core issue, and there’s simply no other way of saying it : Hindus are an endangered species in Tamil Nadu and the longer the Dravidian ideology persists, the greater is the danger of the state turning into another Kerala or West Bengal.

For all his pretensions to rationality, humanism and equality, E.V. Ramaswamy Naicker and his Dravidian ideology replaced an orderly and functional Tamil society and culture with anti-Hindu hatred, disorder, chaos, separatism and epic corruption. A tiny sample from his 1973 public speech will suffice to illustrate this.

Wherever we see a temple, we must go inside and break all the Idols inside. Wherever we find a Paapaan [pejorative for Tamil Brahmanas], we must kill and destroy him … If one non-Brahmin Tamil dies while trying to kill one Tamil Brahmin, only three of us will die out of every hundred. Ninety-four per cent of us will still remain, but Tamil Brahmins will be eliminated. We will definitely go to this level.

This is the leader in whose honour successive Governments and extremist organisations in Tamil Nadu have erected busts … before and adjacent to Hindu temples. Removing them is doing a cultural service to the people of Tamil Nadu.

The sooner Annamalai does this, the better.

(Courtesy : dharmadispatch.in, 13.11.2023)

Some Christians on the nature of Christianity

During the past few centuries the most belligerent, the most aggressive, the most rapacious, the most power-drunk section of humanity has been precisely, the Christian Western world. During these centuries western Christendom had invaded all other continents; its armies followed by priests and merchants have subjugated, robbed or pillaged most of the non-Christians. – Pitirim Sorokin
I call Christianity the one great curse, the one great intrinsic depravity, the one great instinct for revenge for which no expedient is sufficiently poisonous, secret, subterranean, petty. I call it the one mortal blemish of mankind. In Christianity neither morality nor religion comes into contact with reality at any point. – Friedrich Nietzsche
It is because ye are sunk in the cruelty of superstition, or feel no interest in the honour of your Creator, that ye listen to the horrid tales of the Bible, or hear them with callous indifference. The evidence I have produced, and shall still produce in the course of this work, to prove that the Bible is without authority, will, whilst it wounds the stubbornness of a priest, relieve and tranquilize the minds of millions : It will free them from all those hard thoughts of the Almighty which priest-craft and the Bible had infused into their minds, and which stood in everlasting opposition to all their ideas of his moral justice and benevolence.
– Thomas Paine
One would go mad if one took the Bible seriously; but to take it seriously one must be already mad.
– Aleister Crowley