Petition challenges the action in the Rajasthan High Court

Jaipur (Rajasthan) – Administrative action to remove illegal mosques in Rajasthan’s India–Pakistan border region has sparked controversy. Local Muslims staged protests against the action in several border districts, including Barmer and Bikaner. While submitting memoranda to the administration, they alleged that the affected parties were not given adequate opportunity before the mosques were demolished and that due procedure was not properly followed. They demanded that the administration reconsider the action.
According to a petition filed in the Rajasthan High Court, around 12 mosques in different villages within a 15-kilometre radius of the international border were demolished between 18 and 20 June. The petition claims that the action violated the principles of natural justice, as the affected parties were not allowed to present their case.
🛑 Major Action in Rajasthan!
12 illegal mosques built within a 15 km radius of the Pakistan border have been demolished.
A petition has been filed in the Rajasthan High Court challenging this demolition drive.
The state government has firmly stated that the matter is… pic.twitter.com/NOKIPkrrzF
— Sanatan Prabhat (@SanatanPrabhat) July 6, 2026
State Government: The matter concerns national security
The State Government informed the Court that the matter is directly related to national security. It maintained that prior permission under the prescribed rules is mandatory for any permanent construction in sensitive areas adjoining the international border. The Government submitted that the action was taken on this basis.
Life disrupted across the State due to heavy rainfall
Former IPS officer Rajesh Pandey’s book Antaheen claims terrorist Riyaz Bhatkal was killed in Pakistan by Hindu gangsters
Historic first: Two Hindus appointed to the Waqf Board
Religious fanatic arrested in Karnataka with 230 mobile phones, 17 deadly weapons and cannabis
Legislature adjourned over heavy rain and disaster management
Muslim woman arrested for fraud in a land purchase transaction