EXCLUSIVE : 125 Government bodies in the State failed to submit audit reports for 3 to 14 years !

  • Shocking revelation through the Right to Information Act !

  • 768 annual audit or activity reports pending !

Mr. Pritam Nachankar, Special Correspondent, Daily ‘Sanatan Prabhat’

Mumbai, 25 February – The Government has established various corporations, authorities and boards for the welfare of different sections of society. These bodies are meant to function in public service and not for generating profit for the Government. However, under the guise of “public service”, financial indiscipline within these institutions is being overlooked.

As of 14 December 2025, as many as 768 annual reports of corporations, boards, authorities, commissions, institutions and universities in the State are pending. These include annual audit reports and activity reports. While a delay of one or two years may be understandable in certain cases, it has emerged that some institutions have not submitted reports for as long as 14 years. This situation not only undermines administrative discipline but also amounts to a disregard for the Legislature. This information was obtained by Sanatan Prabhat’s Special Correspondent, Mr Pritam Nachankar, from the Legislature under the Right to Information Act. The Government must take serious note of this matter.

Government and semi-government corporations are required to submit their financial statements to the Government every year. To ensure financial discipline and prevent irregularities, it is mandatory for these institutions to present their annual reports before the Legislature. Despite repeated correspondence from the Legislature Secretariat, many institutions have failed to comply. The number of institutions with reports pending for 3 to 14 years stands at 125. Universities are also included in this list.

Institutions with the highest number of pending annual reports

Year-wise classification of pending reportsDelay reasons reduced to mere formalities

Mr. Pritam Nachankar

As per rules, when submitting delayed reports before the Legislature, institutions must also provide reasons for the delay. In practice, however, this has become a mere formality. Instead of giving concrete reasons, identifying lapses and outlining corrective measures, most institutions simply provide a sequence of procedural events. As a result, citing reasons for delay has turned into an empty ritual.

In this regard, an official from the concerned department of the Legislature Secretariat stated that government corporations were not getting access to “government auditors” for conducting audits. (What could be more outrageous than this ? Government institutions claim they cannot find anyone to prepare accounts and therefore do not prepare reports for 14 years ? Officials of such government bodies who give such explanations should now be dismissed from service ! – Editor)

Overall, this situation is extremely serious from the perspective of both administrative functioning and legislative accountability. Ideally, members should raise their voices in the House on such matters; however, that has not happened. Consequently, under the pretext of “public service”, the negligent functioning of government corporations, boards and authorities continues unchecked.

Response of Legislature Secretary Jitendra Bhole

Reports are tabled in the House as per the rules applicable to the respective institutions. Earlier, there used to be greater delays in submitting reports. Compared to that, there has now been improvement, stated Legislature Secretary Jitendra Bhole while responding to Sanatan Prabhat regarding the delay in submission of reports.

Editorial Perspectives

  • This state of affairs does not merely reflect administrative negligence; it raises the fundamental question of whether a functioning system of governance truly exists. If someone alleges that corruption has taken place in all these 125 institutions, where would they be wrong ? All present and former officials of these institutions must be held accountable. Thorough investigations should be conducted, and if corruption is found, the misappropriated amount must be recovered with interest from their salaries or pensions.
  • How can government bodies fail to submit audit and activity reports for so many years and yet face no action from the Legislature ? This is inexcusable. Why should strict action not now be taken even against the State-level administration for such gross negligence ?