Thiruvananthapuram (Kerala) – The right to wear any dress is a part of the right to personal freedom granted by the Constitution. In hearing the case, Kerala High Court held that men do not have a license to outrage a woman’s modesty just because of wearing a seductive outfit. In its decision in the sexual harassment case, the High Court expressed the above opinion regarding Civic Chandran’s anticipatory bail application. Civic Chandran’s anticipatory bail application was challenged in the High Court by the State Government and other complainants. Moreover, the High Court ruled that the Kozhikode Sessions Court gave an incorrect reason for granting anticipatory bail.
Woman’s ‘Provocative Dress’ No Licence For Man To Outrage Her Modesty: Kerala High Court [VIDEO] @aaratrika_11 https://t.co/X1vRcsSIe9
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) October 13, 2022
The order passed by the Kozhikode Sessions Court on 12th August sparked a huge controversy. According to the Court, Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code does not apply to women who wear seductive outfit. As a result, no misconduct case can be filed against the accused. The State Government had approached the Kerala High Court alleging that the order was insensitive. The Court had granted anticipatory bail to Civic Chandran. Kerala High Court upheld lower Court’s decision.
Collective ‘Gadaa Puja’ held at 757 places across the country to increase valour among Hindus and to acquire strength to re-establish ‘Ramrajya’
Do not hold elections in the areas that witnessed violence : Calcutta HC
Government employee killed by terrorists in Rajouri (J&K)
Two Hindus injured in a knife attack by fanatic Muslims during the Ram Navami procession in Davangere, Karnataka.
Major expansion observed in 27% Himalayan glacial lakes : ISRO
Four spices from Indian establishments banned in Singapore and Hong Kong